Why Orbit is different?

Orbit main differences with current competitors

Orbit differentiates itself from its competitors, aiming to become the most used automation layer on top of concentrated liquidity protocols and the go-to platform to deploy concentrated liquidity.

• Orbit vs LPing on Uniswap: Uni v3 is excellent, but several aspects can be improved and automated.

  • 10–15% of liquidity is positioned out-of-range. The Idle Liquidity feature solves this problem by moving your idle liquidity to Aave.

  • 25–30% of positions are not earning fees. Autocompunding and Autorebalancing options are not provided, lowering potential returns.

• Orbit vs Arrakis (ex G-UNI):

  • Orbit is strategy and token-agnostic, meaning that we don’t choose the ranges; instead, the user does. Also, Orbit works for any tokens pair and range, allowing users to apply automation and strategies to their LPs.

• Orbit vs Instadapp:

  • Orbit is focused on LP management and allows users to automate positions over time.

  • Our modules, such as the Idle Liquidity one, enable users to earn fees on idle liquidity.

• Orbit vs Gamma/Popsicle/Harvest:

  • Orbit is not a liquidity manager but an automation tool. By using Orbit, it's possible to replicate, with 0 fees, the most used strategies by active managers. For instance, Popsicle strategies can be easily replicated by the Autorebalance module, and Harvest finance strategies by the Autocompound module.

  • We decided to steer away from active liquidity management as we saw that such solutions hadn't found significant traction or good performance over time.